Methadone Clinics: Attitudes and Practices of Pediatric Oncologists Regarding Methadone Use in the Treatment of Cancer-Related Pain: Results of a North American Survey.
Attitudes and Practices of Pediatric Oncologists Regarding Methadone Use in the Treatment of Cancer-related Pain: Results of a North American Survey.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2012 Dec 13;
Roth M, Davies D, Friebert S, Wang D, Kim M, Zelcer S
Methadone is effective in the treatment of cancer-related pain in adults. Pediatric oncologists may be reluctant to use methadone, given the paucity of existing research and a lack of familiarity with its use. This study’s purpose was to assess pediatric oncologists’ experience, comfort and practice of methadone prescription, and determine interest in and appropriate venues for education on methadone. A 22-item survey was sent by electronic mail to 1912 practicing pediatric oncologists. Six hundred thirty-one pediatric oncologists (33%) responded to the survey. Seventy-two percent of respondents reported they prescribe methadone to <10% of their patients receiving opioids. Physicians practicing ?10 years (84% vs. 76%, P=0.01), at centers that see ?100 new patients per year (86% vs. 76%, P=0.003), or who have received prior education on methadone (89% vs. 54%, P<0.001) were more likely to have prescribed methadone. The primary reasons respondents did not utilize methadone included a lack of knowledge of methadone's pharmacodynamics (39%), effectiveness (39%), and/or dosing equivalence (34%). Perceived competence with dose equivalence, belief that methadone is effective, and working in a division where >20 patients per year died were all independently associated with having prescribed methadone to >10% of patients on opioids. Eighty-five percent of respondents would like additional education on methadone. Many pediatric oncologists lack experience and education in the use of methadone. Formal education initiatives should be implemented to enhance pediatric oncologists’ comfort and expertise in methadone use.
HubMed – Methadone
Perioperative pain therapy in opioid abuse.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Dec 12;
Stromer W, Michaeli K, Sandner-Kiesling A
Opioid addiction represents an exaggerated organic and psychological comorbidity and should be regarded as a high-risk problem. Particular features seen perioperatively are tolerance, hyperalgesia and higher analgesic requirement together with physical and psychological withdrawal symptoms. Adequate pain management should have a high priority even for these patients.This review deals with the specific problems of addiction or opioid tolerance in this vulnerable patient group in the perioperative period. In this group are opioid-tolerant chronic pain patients on long-term therapy, addicts with long-term substitution therapy, those currently addicted and those with a previous history of addiction, mainly to heroin. This article intends to simplify the management of drug-dependent patients and offers strategies for perioperative analgesia that include stabilisation of physical dependency by substitution with methadone or ?-agonists; avoidance of stress; use of regional techniques in combination with non-opioids or opioids with higher doses than those used in non-addicts; avoidance of inadequate analgesic dosing; effective use of the opioid-sparing effect of different co-analgesics; and psychological support wherever appropriate.Those caring for abstinent patients should note that an inadequate dosage of analgesics can potentially reactivate addiction. After successful withdrawal of opioids and prolonged abstinence, opioid therapy can result in an exaggerated response.
HubMed – Methadone
Retrospective study of outcomes, for patients admitted to a drug treatment centre board.
Ir Med J. 2012 Oct; 105(9): 295-8
Somers CJ, O’Connor J
Retrospective study of urinary heroin outcomes of a cohort (123) of patients commenced on a methadone treatment program. Significantly poorer outcomes were associated with urines positive for cocaine (OR 0.69 CI 0.59-0.81) benzodiazepines (OR 0.7 CI 0.53-0.93) with prescribing of low dose methadone (OR 0.65 CI 0.48-0.87), with urines positive for heroin at time of admission (OR 0.74 CI 0.56-0.97) and with behavioural sanctions (OR 0.8, CI 0.65-0.98). Improved outcomes were associated with granting of take away methadone (OR 1.34 CI 1.1-1.62). with an indication of improved outcomes associated with alcohol positive urines (OR 1.34 CI 0.95-1.9) and increased duration of clinic attendance (OR 1.21 CI 0.99-1.47). On multiple regression analysis low dose methadone (0.07 CI 0.01-0.33) prescribing remained negatively associated with urine heroin outcomes.
HubMed – Methadone
More Methadone Clinics Information…